baloghadamsoftware marked an inline comment as done.
baloghadamsoftware added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorModeling.cpp:541-542
+        BR.markInteresting(It1);
+        if (const auto &LCV1 = It1.getAs<nonloc::LazyCompoundVal>()) {
+          BR.markInteresting(LCV1->getRegion());
+        }
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> NoQ wrote:
> > baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> > > NoQ wrote:
> > > > I'm opposed to this code for the same reason that i'm opposed to it in 
> > > > the debug checker. Parent region is an undocumented implementation 
> > > > detail of `RegionStore`. It is supposed to be immaterial to the user. 
> > > > You should not rely on its exact value.
> > > > 
> > > > @baloghadamsoftware Can we eliminate all such code from iterator 
> > > > checkers and instead identify all iterators by regions in which they're 
> > > > stored? Does my improved C++ support help with this anyhow whenever it 
> > > > kicks in?
> > > How to find the region where it is stored? I am open to find better 
> > > solutions, but it was the only one I could find so far. If we ignore 
> > > `LazyCompoundVal` then everything falls apart, we can remove all the 
> > > iterator-related checkers.
> > It's the region from which you loaded it. If you obtained it as 
> > `Call.getArgSVal()` then it's the parameter region for the call. If you 
> > obtained it as `Call.getReturnValue()` then it's the target region can be 
> > obtained by looking at the //construction context// for the call.
> `LazyCompoundVal` and friends seem to be a constantly emerging headache for 
> almost everyone. For how long I've spent in the analyzer, and have 
> religiously studied conversations and your workbook about it, I still feel 
> anxious whenever it comes up.
> 
> It would be great to have this documented in the code sometime.
Do you mean `CallEvent::getParameterLocation()` for arguments? What is the 
//construction context// for the call? How can it be obtained?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D75677/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D75677



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to