Szelethus added a comment. The fix looks great!
In D76790#1941857 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76790#1941857>, @martong wrote: > I was thinking about the below test, but then I reverted back because I don't > want to add "fake" summaries for testing purposes. Perhaps adding a new > checker option could enable these "fake" summaries, @Szelethus what's your > opinion? The fake summary sounds great. You could hide it behind a debug checker, if we are to be that cautious. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76790/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76790 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
