njames93 added a comment.

I'm not entirely sure this is where the fix needs to be for this. The test case 
code is whacky as hell, but from what I can see clang should always emit a 
`BinaryOperator` for dependent type operators. No idea why it is spewing out a 
`CXXOperatorCallExpr` instead. Would need someone with more knowledge on Sema 
to confirm(or deny) this though.



================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone-unhandled-self-assignment.cpp:516
 public:
-  NotACopyAssignmentOperator& operator=(const NotACopyAssignmentOperator<Uy, 
Ty> &RHS) {
+  NotACopyAssignmentOperator &operator=(const NotACopyAssignmentOperator<Uy, 
Ty> &RHS) {
     Ptr1 = RHS.getUy();
----------------
clang format artefact? This change should be undone as its unrelated to the 
patch.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D76990/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D76990



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to