njames93 added a comment.
I'm not entirely sure this is where the fix needs to be for this. The test case
code is whacky as hell, but from what I can see clang should always emit a
`BinaryOperator` for dependent type operators. No idea why it is spewing out a
`CXXOperatorCallExpr` instead. Would need someone with more knowledge on Sema
to confirm(or deny) this though.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone-unhandled-self-assignment.cpp:516
public:
- NotACopyAssignmentOperator& operator=(const NotACopyAssignmentOperator<Uy,
Ty> &RHS) {
+ NotACopyAssignmentOperator &operator=(const NotACopyAssignmentOperator<Uy,
Ty> &RHS) {
Ptr1 = RHS.getUy();
----------------
clang format artefact? This change should be undone as its unrelated to the
patch.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76990/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76990
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
