MarcusJohnson91 added a comment. In D33029#1946761 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029#1946761>, @bbassi wrote:
> I don't think that's quite right. Then you will also have to have a > `AlignWithDanglingParenthesis` for cases when people still want closing > parenthesis on new line but want parameters as well as closing parenthesis to > be aligned with opening parenthesis. I think we need a separate option, > something like `BreakBeforeClosingBracket`. I think that's the biggest problem with making changes to Clang-Format, every name does things that the name doesn't imply. Here it's very similar to the bin packing options, in my case it's BraceWrapping.AfterExternBlock also indenting by default, making adding a IndentExternBlock a real pain. I personally say fuck backwards compatibility when maintaining it requires ever more workarounds to fix an obviously flawed abstraction, but I'm just some dude and AFAIK the guys in charge support the status quo. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
