aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang.natvis:25
@@ +24,3 @@
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::Builtin"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::BuiltinType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::Pointer"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::PointerType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::Attributed"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::AttributedType *)this}</DisplayString>
----------------
If we're handling pointers, perhaps we should also do references similarly?
Also, perhaps functions as well (bonus points if you can suss out the function
prototype and display it!)?
================
Comment at: clang.natvis:26
@@ +25,3 @@
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::Pointer"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::PointerType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::Attributed"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::AttributedType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString
Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::TemplateTypeParm"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::TemplateTypeParmType *)this}</DisplayString>
----------------
I think this should be `TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::Attributed`
instead.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18163
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
