jdoerfert updated this revision to Diff 256108.
jdoerfert added a comment.

Use @lattern 's wording which is more specific and has less spelling errors.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77683/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77683

Files:
  llvm/docs/CodeReview.rst


Index: llvm/docs/CodeReview.rst
===================================================================
--- llvm/docs/CodeReview.rst
+++ llvm/docs/CodeReview.rst
@@ -29,8 +29,9 @@
 significant patches to be reviewed before being committed. Smaller patches
 (or patches where the developer owns the component) that meet
 likely-community-consensus requirements (as apply to all patch approvals) can
-be committed prior to an explicit review. In situations where there is any
-uncertainty, a patch should be reviewed prior to being committed.
+be committed prior to an explicit review. If there is likely to be uncertainty,
+you should default to getting a patch reviewed prior to commit, particularly if
+someone has asked for extra review of a specific area.
 
 Please note that the developer responsible for a patch is also
 responsible for making all necessary review-related changes, including


Index: llvm/docs/CodeReview.rst
===================================================================
--- llvm/docs/CodeReview.rst
+++ llvm/docs/CodeReview.rst
@@ -29,8 +29,9 @@
 significant patches to be reviewed before being committed. Smaller patches
 (or patches where the developer owns the component) that meet
 likely-community-consensus requirements (as apply to all patch approvals) can
-be committed prior to an explicit review. In situations where there is any
-uncertainty, a patch should be reviewed prior to being committed.
+be committed prior to an explicit review. If there is likely to be uncertainty,
+you should default to getting a patch reviewed prior to commit, particularly if
+someone has asked for extra review of a specific area.
 
 Please note that the developer responsible for a patch is also
 responsible for making all necessary review-related changes, including
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to