ASDenysPetrov added a comment. @NoQ , sorry for the late response, was working on other patch.
> Why are we getting a compound value here? We are getting **nonloc::SymbolVal** here, not a compound value, since //* *ptr// result is unknown after //*ptr = foo();// (look at the test sample). The root cause was that we compared **nonloc** with Zero sval which was **loc** and we got an assertion as a result. Here I've improved and simplified a bit and now it is handles OK without assertions and passes all the tests. What do you think, is it worth to be landed? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77062/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77062 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
