tentzen added a comment. In D77936#1976984 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77936#1976984>, @efriedma wrote:
> I'm not concerned about the performance implications of whatever approach we > take here. In the worst case, an "icmp+zext" corresponds to two extra > arithmetic instructions; that's not enough to matter. And I expect usually > it'll get optimized away. > > I'd prefer to avoid exposing our cleanup numbering to user code, if possible. > The Microsoft documentation says it returns 0 or 1. OK, will do.. thanks Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77936/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77936 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
