ABataev added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/StmtOpenMP.h:4781-4784
+/// This represents the '#pragma omp tile' loop transformation directive.
+class OMPTileDirective final
+ : public OMPLoopDirective,
+ private llvm::TrailingObjects<OMPTileDirective, OMPClause *, Stmt *> {
----------------
Not sure that this is a good idea to treat this directive as the executable
directive. To me, it looks like kind of `AttributedStmt`. Maybe better to
introduce some kind of a new base node for this and similar constructs, which
does not own the loop but is its kind of attribute-like entity?
Also, can we have something like:
```
#pragma omp simd
#pragma omp tile ...
for(...) ;
```
Thoughts?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76342/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76342
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
