broadwaylamb added a comment.
In D78404#1990192 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78404#1990192>, @rsmith wrote:
> ... please also test ...
>
> template<typename T> class TemplateClass3<T, &TestClass::func>
> varTemplate3{};
>
>
> ... which we should diagnose, because that's a primary variable template
> definition, not a partial / explicit specialization or explicit instantiation.
Interestingly, the latest GCC doesn't diagnose here
<https://godbolt.org/z/svejsJ>, but we do. Do we need to remain compatible with
GCC in this case?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78404/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78404
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
