atmnpatel marked 2 inline comments as done.
atmnpatel added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:3211-3213
+          VD->getStorageClass() == SC_Static &&
+          (CanonicalVD->getDeclContext()->isNamespace() ||
+           !VD->isLocalVarDeclOrParm())) {
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> atmnpatel wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > I think just `!VD->hasLocalStorage()` should be enough here. Shall it 
> > > work for static locals too or just for globals?
> > Just for globals.
> What about static data members?
The TR doesn't specify that static data members should inherit DSAs / have them 
explicitly defined.


================
Comment at: clang/test/OpenMP/parallel_master_codegen.cpp:145
+
+// CK31:       define internal {{.*}}void [[OMP_OUTLINED]](i32* noalias 
[[GTID:%.+]], i32* noalias [[BTID:%.+]], i32* dereferenceable(4) [[A_VAL]])
+// CK31:       [[GTID_ADDR:%.+]] = alloca i32*
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> atmnpatel wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > Some extra work is required. The variable should not be captured by 
> > > reference, must be captured by value. Also, a test with calling 
> > > constructors/destructors is required.
> > Sorry, I added a test with constructors/destructors with codegen. The 
> > variable capture discussion was had above and I'm pretty sure that the 
> > conclusion above (correct me if I'm wrong) was that its not ideal, but its 
> > fine for now and will be adjusted with the upcoming OMPIRBuilder.
> It shall emit the correct code anyway. With `default(firstprivate)` and 
> explicit `firstprivate` clause the codegen will be different and it may lead 
> to an incompatibility with the existing libraries/object files.
Ohh I see your concern now. Is the conclusion that I should just table this 
until something new pops up? I couldn't follow up on @fghanim's advice (sorry 
I've been on and off trying different things for weeks), it's beyond my 
capabilities.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D75591/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D75591



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to