efriedma added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp:7670
+                     Mask, Op.getOperand(0), Op.getOperand(1));
+}
+
----------------
sdesmalen wrote:
> efriedma wrote:
> > If we're going to support these operations, we might as well just add isel 
> > patterns; that's what we've been doing for other arithmetic operations.
> Just to provide a bit of context to this approach:
> 
> For unpredicated ISD nodes for which there is no predicated instruction, the 
> predicate needs to be generated. For scalable vectors this will be a `ptrue 
> all`, but for fixed-width vectors may take some other predicate such as VL8 
> for fixed `8` elements.
> 
> Rather than creating new predicated AArch64 ISD nodes for each operation such 
> as `AArch64ISD::UDIV_PRED`, the idea is to reuse the intrinsic layer we 
> already added to support the ACLE - which are predicated and for which we 
> already have the patterns - and map directly onto those.
> 
> By doing the expansion in ISelLowering, the patterns stay simple and we can 
> generalise `getPtrue` method so that it generates the right predicate for any 
> scalable/fixed vector size as done in D71760 avoiding the need to write 
> multiple patterns for different vector lengths.
> 
> This patch was meant as the proof of concept of that idea (as discussed in 
> the sync-up call of Apr 2). 
Using INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN is a little annoying; it's hard to read in DAG dumps, 
and it gives weird error messages if we fail in selection.  But there aren't 
really any other immediate downsides I can think of, vs. doing it the other way 
(converting the intrinsic to AArch64ISD::UDIV_PRED).

Long-term, we're going to have a target-independent ISD::UDIV_PRED.  We 
probably want to start using those nodes at some point, to get 
target-independent optimizations. Not sure if that impacts what we want to do 
right now.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78569/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D78569



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to