arichardson added a comment. In D78478#1994923 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78478#1994923>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> I feel there is a lot of good stuff here but it seems to mix two things. A > rewrite of the script infrastructure and the UTC_ARGS stuff. If so, do you > think we could split them? I feel there are also minor NFC changes that could > go in on their own without review, I marked on of them below. > > (Partially related: Does this handle the mismatch between `enabled` > configuration status and the flag names `enable/disable` or will it still add > `--enabled` to the UTC_ARGS?) It will now read the command line flag that was specified when calling parser.add_argument() and should do the right thing. I'll split out the unrelated changes to separate reviews. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78478/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78478 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
