rnk accepted this revision.
rnk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Seems reasonable.



================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/pragma-clang-section.c:2
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -triple arm-none-eabi
-#pragma clang section bss="mybss.1" data="mydata.1" rodata="myrodata.1" 
text="mytext.1"
+#pragma clang section bss = "mybss.1" data = "mydata.1" rodata = "myrodata.1" 
text = "mytext.1" // expected-note {{#pragma entered here}} expected-note 
{{#pragma entered here}}
 #pragma clang section bss="" data="" rodata="" text=""
----------------
You can use `expected-note 2 {{#pragma entered here]}` to expect the same 
diagnostic twice.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78572/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D78572



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to