Abpostelnicu added a comment.

I think we are on the right track with this but what if we are dealing with 
`tok::amp` in a context similar to `operator const FallibleTArray<E>&();` I can 
speculate that the outcome will be `operator const FallibleTArray<E> &();` 
which is wrong.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78879/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D78879



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to