Abpostelnicu added a comment. I think we are on the right track with this but what if we are dealing with `tok::amp` in a context similar to `operator const FallibleTArray<E>&();` I can speculate that the outcome will be `operator const FallibleTArray<E> &();` which is wrong.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78879/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78879 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits