martong added a comment.

In D78118#2007943 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78118#2007943>, @martong wrote:

> In D78118#1988464 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78118#1988464>, @balazske wrote:
>
> > The new option will simply list the (found) functions that have a summary 
> > based check enabled. (The term "Loaded" may be misleading in the current 
> > implementation, somebody can think if it is loaded from file?) A more 
> > detailed output would be better (display the signature too, or maybe the 
> > whole summary?). For simple purpose the current way may be enough but it 
> > may be useful (probably for a non-checker-developer too) to see the summary 
> > details.
>
>
> Yes, "loaded" might not be the best, I changed it to "found". About the more 
> detailed output: is there a way to dump nicely the signature of a function 
> decl? I don't want to dump the AST of it because that might be overkill. 
> Could I just dump the content of the buffer that relates to the SourceRange 
> of the FunctionDecl (if that does not have a definition)?


I just have updated the patch so now the signature is printed.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78118/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D78118



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to