Anastasia added a comment.

In D78979#2010527 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979#2010527>, @svenvh wrote:

> In D78979#2007643 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979#2007643>, @Anastasia wrote:
>
> > > Would it not become confusing since the builtins are going to be included 
> > > by default? Should we rename the flag at least? Also ideally it should be 
> > > documented in https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#opencl-header
> >
> > ah I guess if we leave it under `-cc1 ` we will have the command line 
> > interface as follows:
> >
> > - Driver (without `-cc1`) adds OpenCL header by default that can be 
> > overridden by the flag added in this patch.
> > - Frontend (with `-cc1`) doesn't add the header by default but there are 
> > two flags `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` or `-finclude-default-header` that 
> > allow to include the header.
>
>
> The name of `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` becomes a bit non-intuitive, a more 
> intuitive name would be something like `-fopencl-tablegen-builtins` perhaps 
> or `-fopencl-fast-builtins` if we don't want to mention TableGen.  But since 
> it is still an experimental option, I have no objections against postponing 
> the renaming until the option has reached maturity.


I vote for `-fopencl-fast-builtins`.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to