krasimir added a comment. In D79095#2010271 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79095#2010271>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> In D79095#2010250 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79095#2010250>, @krasimir wrote: > > > Awesome! Thank you! > > Now that we've got "clang/phabricator/lint/git" robots that leave comments > > on patches, we may want to think about a way to have this automatically > > enforced in the future. > > > Thats a great idea.. do you know who looks after those scripts? I asked around and a simple thing we can do that would have the effect of complaining on the Phabricator patch if the format options doc has to be regenerated is a lit test that does a diff. Will prepare a patch, after this lands, so that the newly added test doesn't fail at first. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79095/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79095 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
