jdenny added a comment. In D79276#2017742 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276#2017742>, @jdenny wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I've replied to a few comments, and I'll address the > rest later. > > In D79276#2017101 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276#2017101>, @jhenderson > wrote: > > > I hesitate to suggest this, but is it worth using `REM` as a comment > > prefix? It's the comment marker for Windows batch files, so has some > > precedence. > > > I don't have a strong preference. Does anyone else following this have a > preference? One reason not to choose `REM:` is that it looks much more like `RUN:` than `COM:`. For example, imagine the long code sample I wrote in my last comment <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276#inline-726677>, but with `COM:` replaced by `REM:`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79276 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
