martong added a comment. In D79433#2022353 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79433#2022353>, @balazske wrote:
> The checker or at least the source file should be split somehow, adding of > summaries should be separated from the other parts, otherwise the file will > be too long. Yes, I've been thinking about to have a separate `PosixFunctions.cpp` to populate the posix function summaries. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79433/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79433 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
