aaron.ballman added a comment. In D46317#2023406 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D46317#2023406>, @khuttun wrote:
> Any comments on this? Is this checker something that could be part of > clang-tidy? Thank you for posting some of the diagnostics found by the check, that was really helpful information! I spot-checked ~10 of the issues it reported and all of them were false positives. Were you able to find any true positives from that list? I think 1200 reports without any true positives indicates that the check may be too chatty to include (it may also suggest that `bugprone` is the wrong place for the check). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D46317/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D46317 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
