fghanim added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPKinds.def:244
 
-// TODO: Replace this with the real size_t type
-#define __OMP_SIZE_TYPE(NAME) OMP_TYPE(NAME, Type::getInt64Ty(Ctx))
+#define __OMP_SIZE_TYPE(NAME) OMP_TYPE(NAME, 
M.getDataLayout().getIntPtrType(Ctx))
 __OMP_SIZE_TYPE(SizeTy)
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> jhuber6 wrote:
> > I'm just directly getting the SizeTy from the Module, I'm not sure if this 
> > is a permanent solution.
> I actually think this is fine. Less burden on the frontends also. @fghanim 
> looks good?
Agreed. But to avoid conflict with patch D79675, let this change go in a 
separate patch after that. This way, we can also do some clean ups related to 
this, and add `Int8PtrPtr`, `Int8PtrPtrPtr`, and any other typing issues, 
without delaying patch D79675 any further - I am done with that patch, and made 
my final changes a couple of days ago.

Nit: Also, I saw below that some formatting was done. Wouldn't it be better if 
formatting/comments related to changes in D79739, are handled as part of that 
patch?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D80222/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80222



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to