Szelethus accepted this revision.
Szelethus added a subscriber: balazske.
Szelethus added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM! I think you could remove the extra parameter, but I don't think this 
warrants another round of review on my end. However, the dynamic size change 
seems very unfamiliar to me. @baloghadamsoftware, @balazske, could you take a 
peek?



================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:237
+      SVal BufDynSize =
+          getDynamicSizeWithOffset(State, BufV, C.getSValBuilder());
+
----------------
You can retrieve `SValBuilder` from `ProgramState`: 
`State->getStateManager().getSValBuilder()`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77066/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77066



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to