jdoerfert added a comment. In D79744#2069786 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79744#2069786>, @arsenm wrote:
> In D79744#2069774 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79744#2069774>, @arsenm wrote: > > > I think this is converging to adding a new IR attribute that essentially > > just provides the pointee type for ABI purposes. I guess my name ideas for > > this would be "indirect", "value", "memoryvalue", "abitype"? > > > My main question for a new attribute is whether it needs to be explicitly > read only. I think the answer is no, since you can't ordinarily write to any > random pointer argument I think this is "in practice" correct (assuming you don't see a write to that location in which case you can do some crazy stuff). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79744/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79744 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
