yonghong-song added a comment. Thanks, @dblaikie
>> I think if we're going to support "const void" we should support "void" too >> & fix the verifier to allow this & make sure LLVM produces the correct debug >> info for it (which is probably a DW_TAG_variable without a DW_AT_type >> attribute (same as a function with a void return type has no DW_AT_type >> attribute) - and check that GCC does the same thing. Your suggestion makes sense, I will try to fix the fatal error according to what you suggested. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81131/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81131 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
