jdoerfert added a comment. Do we allow `inmem` to be used for other purposes? I would assume the answer is yes, as we do not forbid it. I ask because front-ends might use this as a way to add type information to a pointer (especially after we strip them). Or am I confusing something here?
> `byref` Would be fine with me too. > I guess the verifier could require you to specify align if you use this, but > that's another inconsistency This would be in line with our efforts to *always* require an alignment. Should write it down, make the verifier aware and apply it to `byval` as well, maybe others too. The entire "target specific alignment" stuff should be resolved as early as possible to not cause confusion and subtle bugs. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81311 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
