arsenm added a comment. In D82249#2107845 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D82249#2107845>, @hctim wrote:
> In D82249#2105036 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D82249#2105036>, @arsenm wrote: > > > Is the fallback not working correctly in this case for some reason? > > > I'm fairly sure that G_GLOBAL_VALUE used to fallback onto SelectionDAGISel, > and that was changed in D78465 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78465>. Because we > only implemented the custom `adrp+movk` lowering in SelectionDAGISel, making > that instruction sequence no longer fallback, so we don't get our proper > lowering for HWASan globals. I don't follow. It no longer falls back, so what is the problem? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D82249/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D82249 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
