eduucaldas added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TreeTest.cpp:2192
R"cpp(
+class osstream {};
struct X {
----------------
gribozavr2 wrote:
> I don't think we need a separate class to show the left shift operator. The
> declaration below can be:
>
> ```
> friend X operator<<(X&, const X&);
> ```
If we don't bother much about "realistic" operator declarations we could drop
all the `friend` and declare every operator in their most concise form. WDYT
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82954/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82954
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
