uweigand marked 2 inline comments as done. uweigand added a comment. In D81583#2137277 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81583#2137277>, @efriedma wrote:
> I'm tempted to say this is a bugfix for the implementation of > no_unique_address, and just fix it globally for all ABIs. We're never going > to get anything done here if we require a separate patch for each ABI variant > clang supports. Well, I can certainly do that. Would you prefer me to completely remove the AllowNoUniqueAddress parameter, or keep it but default to true (so ABIs can still override if necessary)? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81583/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81583 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
