eduucaldas accepted this revision. eduucaldas added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Additionally, consider applying a similar change to `CharLiteralParser`, for consistency. All the comments are just suggestions. Feel free to land this without answering them. ================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Lex/LiteralSupport.h:57-59 - NumericLiteralParser(StringRef TokSpelling, - SourceLocation TokLoc, - Preprocessor &PP); ---------------- We don't need to remove this constructor, we can keep the same signature and make it call the new constructor. The same is done for `StringLiteralParser`. That would allow some callers that don't care much about the implementation details to just use the simpler to write version. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp:766 + !isValidUDSuffix(LangOpts, StringRef(s, ThisTokEnd - s))) { + Diags.Report(AdvanceToTokenCharacter(TokLoc, s - ThisTokBegin), + diag::err_invalid_digit) ---------------- How about just using `Lexer::AdvanceToTokenCharacter`? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D83480/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D83480 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits