sammccall added a comment. In D82436#2142631 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D82436#2142631>, @kbobyrev wrote:
> In D82436#2141953 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D82436#2141953>, @sammccall wrote: > > > Tests :-) > > > I was hoping glorious DocumentSymbols super tested API would shield me from > that :P While the implementation is shared, a very small set of tests is fine. We should at least include some of the ranges that are "incorrect" that we want to fix. > Didn't think of reasonable testing strategy but fair enough, will do! I think you can literally just use an `Annotations` marked with all the ranges you expect. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D82436/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D82436 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
