rsmith added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp:2110
+      DetermineNoUndef(RetTy, getTypes(), DL, RetAI)) {
+    RetAttrs.addAttribute(llvm::Attribute::NoUndef);
+  }
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> This only applies in C++. In C, it's valid for a function to omit its 
> `return` statement if the result value is unused, and in that case the 
> returned value will legitimately be `undef`.
> 
> Even in C++, we're conservative about enforcing the constraint that functions 
> return a proper value and control flow doesn't just fall off the bottom of 
> the function. See the full set of checks here: 
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp#L1322
It would seem sensible to suppress this for `extern "C"` functions too, on the 
basis that the definition of such functions is probably in C code, and thus 
they might return `undef`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D81678/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D81678



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to