sberg added inline comments. Herald added a subscriber: dang.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td:1778 + HelpText<"Enable stack clash protection">; +def fnostack_clash_protection : Flag<["-"], "fnostack-clash-protection">, Group<f_Group>, + HelpText<"Disable stack clash protection">; ---------------- Should this rather spell `"fno-stack-clash-protection"`? The above change to clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst (but which got overwritten by <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9624beb38a46037f69362650a52e06d8be4fd006> "[docs] Regenerate ClangCommandLineReference.rst") mentions `-fno-stack-clash-protection`, and also GCC calls it like that. (Though the below clang/test/Driver/stack-clash-protection.c does use `-fnostack-clash-protection`.) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
