njames93 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:210
GetClangTidyOptions(*TFS.view(/*CWD=*/llvm::None), File);
+ if (!Opts.ClangTidyOpts.Checks) {
+ // If the user hasn't configured clang-tidy checks at all, including
----------------
Should the `!` be removed the branches be swapped? Just looks cleaner imo,
WDYT?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83224/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83224
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
