arsenm added a comment. In D86154#2224270 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86154#2224270>, @nhaehnle wrote:
> Note that part of my motivation here over D84639 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84639> is to support more general types on the > lane intrinsics, since they also express some semantic content which would be > interesting to be able to express e.g. on descriptors. I wasn't able to bend > the SelectionDAG type legalization to my will, so that's why I instead > "legalize" the intrinsics in the AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare pass. Don't you just need to handle this in ReplaceNodeResults the same way? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86154/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86154 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
