sammccall accepted this revision.
sammccall added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1489
       return true;
+  if (isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(D) && D->isInvalidDecl())
+    return true;
----------------
split into separate block, add a comment why


================
Comment at: clang/test/PCH/cxx-invalid-destructor.cpp:2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -std=c++11 -emit-pch -o %t 
%S/cxx-invalid-destructor.h -fallow-pch-with-compiler-errors
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -std=c++11 -include-pch %t 
%S/cxx-invalid-destructor.cpp -fsyntax-only -fno-validate-pch
+
----------------
nit: -fno-validate-pch shouldn't be needed IIUC


================
Comment at: clang/test/PCH/cxx-invalid-destructor.h:6
+
+class Bar {
+public:
----------------
nit: we can eliminate Bar I think?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86624/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86624

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to