dylanmckay added inline comments.

================
Comment at: llvm/lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp:4297
+  // address space of 1.
+  if (T.isAMDGPU() && !DL.contains("-G") && !DL.startswith("G")) {
+    return DL.empty() ? std::string("G1") : (DL + "-G1").str();
----------------
arichardson wrote:
> akhuang wrote:
> > arichardson wrote:
> > > arsenm wrote:
> > > > I would expect datalayout upgrades to work by parsing the old string, 
> > > > and checking the field values inside. I guess directly checking the 
> > > > string isn't a new problem here
> > > I agree that would be less error prone. I wonder if there are cases where 
> > > the old string may fail to parse so you have to do the textual upgrade 
> > > first. I'm happy to make this change.
> > > 
> > > @akhuang is there a reason you used string parsing in D67631? Any 
> > > objections to changing the code to parse the datalayout and add missing 
> > > attributes?
> > I don't think so; parsing the datalayout sounds better to me too. 
> I just looked into parsing the DataLayout instead. Unfortunately the 
> resulting code is more complicated since there are no setters in DataLayout 
> and no way to create a normalized representation.
> There's also no way to differentiate between no `-G ` passed and `-G0` so  
> something like `e-p:64:64-G0` will be converted to `e-p:64:64-G0-G1`
> 
I suspect it would be possible to use the existing `DataLayout(StringRef)` 
constructor on the string, then call `getDefaultGlobalsAddressSpace()` on it, 
explicitly ignoring modifying the datalayout for the special case of an 
explicit `-G0`.

For example,

```cpp
  DataLayout ParsedDL = DataLayout(DL);
  if (T.isAMDGPU() && !DL.contains("-G0") 
&&ParsedDL.getDefaultGlobalsAddressSpace() != 1) {
    return DL.empty() ? std::string("G1") : (DL + "-G1").str();
  }
```

As I understand it, this would cover the fact that we cannot distinguish 
between an explicit default globals space of zero, and a datalayout without a 
default globals space (also `DL::getDefaultGlobalsAddressSpace() == 0`) by 
explicitly excluding the special case `-G0`


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D84345/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D84345

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to