baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D85351#2247095 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85351#2247095>, @Szelethus wrote:
> I think its a bad experience if you break something while developing. Instead > of getting a test failure for "delegating constructor initializers", you'll > have to deal with a test that handles a variety of things at once, and are > forced to tease it apart to find what just broke. When the introduced assert > fires, this wouldn't be an issue, but in any non-crashing case it might be. This is a crashing case. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85351/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85351 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
