cryptoad added a comment. In D86694#2268182 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86694#2268182>, @russell.gallop wrote:
> > Thanks. I'm looking at porting the standalone variant, drawing on D42519 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D42519> and Windows support from sanitizer_common. > Does that sound like a reasonable approach? Yup, the structure is a tad different, and other platforms (Fuchsia, Linux cpp) have some implementation of the platform specific functions. > Would these be good flags to use: > > set > SCUDO_OPTIONS=allocator_release_to_os_interval_ms=-1:QuarantineSizeKb=0:ThreadLocalQuarantineSizeKb=0:DeleteSizeMismatch=0:DeallocationTypeMismatch=0 Yup, no release, no quarantine is a great. Size class map compile time options could also make a difference. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86694/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86694 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
