rengolin added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18823#397112, @hfinkel wrote:
> However, as an implementation extension, this concern is not relevant. I'm in > favor of this; I have uses who use this feature in GCC. It is certainly true > that most HPC users are using these on PODs, but the fact that you cannot > apply them to other types creates a problem with generic programming that > people have run into. Sounds odd to argue in favour of generic programming and not in favour of using generic standard containers. I can easily accept the legacy argument, but creating new code with contentious features seems totally backwards to me. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18823 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
