tra accepted this revision.
tra added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Does this naming scheme the same as used for `.o` files? We may want to keep
them in sync.
Other than that, LGTM.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp:909
+ auto AddPostfix = [JA](auto &F) {
+ if (JA.getOffloadingDeviceKind() == Action::OFK_HIP)
+ F += (Twine("_") + JA.getOffloadingArch()).str();
----------------
I think the same approach would make sense for CUDA, too.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87791/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87791
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
