Bdragon28 added a comment.

In D79916#2279884 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79916#2279884>, @jrtc27 wrote:

> But also you really should not get warnings for unused static functions in 
> included headers, only ones defined in the C source file itself. We'd have 
> countless warnings in the kernel across all architectures otherwise.

I agree. But that's what it is doing when using always_inline in combination 
with -Wunused-function.

There is currently no real usage of always_inline in system headers though, so 
maybe I'm just the first to complain about it?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79916/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79916

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to