rnk added a comment. In D87808#2280197 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808#2280197>, @dblaikie wrote:
> @rsmith What's the deal with these anonymous structs/unions? Why do they have > copy/move constructors (are those technically called from the enclosing > class's copy/move constructors?) but no default constructor to be called from > the other ctors of the enclosing class? Yes, I'm curious: copy and move constructors require an object of this type to already exist in memory. Is there a well-defined way of creating an object of this type in memory when it has no other constructors? Maybe the issue is that this code is running into the lazy implicit special member declaration optimization. Maybe the class in question has an implicit, trivial, default constructor, but we there is no CXXConstructorDecl present in the ctors list for the loop to find. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
