dblaikie added a comment. In D87673#2275940 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87673#2275940>, @sammccall wrote:
> Thanks, this seems better than crashing. > The practical result isn't wonderful: the two are going to fight over index > files to some extent. But this can happen with different clangd versions > (that use different index format versions) anyway. So this is really just > graceful recovery from a bad situation. > > In D87673#2273347 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87673#2273347>, @ArcsinX wrote: > >> Unsure about test for this > > Agree, testing this seems hard and not that useful. FWIW here's how to test codepaths only reachable when zlib is not available: ./llvm/test/tools/llvm-dwp/X86/nocompress.test: REQUIRES: !zlib Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87673/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87673 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
