dberris added a comment. There's two tensions I'm trying to resolve in my mind with this patch:
- Is there a way to make this more deterministic, instead of using a random sampling mechanism based on the name? - This looks like it's a subset of a more general facility to group functions by "module" or some logical grouping mechanism. Will this be superseded by a feature that allows for example to provide filters in the driver to define groupings? If so, wouldn't something like that be more flexible for your needs (group names in the IR)? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87953/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87953 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
