stuij created this revision.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
stuij requested review of this revision.

This test broke for our toolchain as this test triggered unrelated
warnings. Being more specific about not expecting fuse-ld warnings won't
invalidate the test, while playing a bit nicer with possible unrelated features.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88566

Files:
  clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c


Index: clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c
+++ clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang %s -### -target x86_64-unknown-linux \
 // RUN:   -fuse-ld=/usr/local/bin/or1k-linux-ld 2>&1 | \
 // RUN:   FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-WARN
-// CHECK-NO-WARN-NOT: warning:
+// CHECK-NO-WARN-NOT: warning: 'fuse-ld'
 
 // RUN: %clang %s -### \
 // RUN:     -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd 2>&1 \


Index: clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c
+++ clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang %s -### -target x86_64-unknown-linux \
 // RUN:   -fuse-ld=/usr/local/bin/or1k-linux-ld 2>&1 | \
 // RUN:   FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-WARN
-// CHECK-NO-WARN-NOT: warning:
+// CHECK-NO-WARN-NOT: warning: 'fuse-ld'
 
 // RUN: %clang %s -### \
 // RUN:     -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd 2>&1 \
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to