shivanshu3 added a comment. In D88680#2307564 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88680#2307564>, @rnk wrote:
> I think the flag was originally intended to be an internal -cc1 flag not > exposed to users. You should be able to work around your problem with > `-Xclang -fno-pch-instantiate-templates`, btw. > > ---- > > @zequanwu, can you patch this in locally and take over this patch? Please > address the hasFlag comment above, add a test to clang/test/Driver, and make > sure the flag works with `--driver-mode=gcc` and `--driver-mode=cl`. Follow > the examples of the other tests, run clang with `-###`, and make sure this > flag does or does not appear on the `-cc1` line. Should we keep this flag internal though, or is it OK to make it a core flag? Our codebase had hundreds of compile errors caused by this default behavior which was hard to track down, so I'm guessing other people compiling with clang-cl might face similar problems? Or maybe we should re-think about making this the default behavior for clang-cl. Personally I don't have any strong preferences because we have a workaround now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88680/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88680 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits