ldionne added a comment. Are the runtimes expected to support this multi-distribution configuration? I don't think we'd want to move libc++ towards building multiple configurations at once in a single CMake invocation -- it's already too complicated to build just one configuration.
While I'm very sympathetic to the use case, it looks like this is working against the design of CMake. So, as long as the runtimes are not impacted by this change (which seems to be the case right now), I don't mind. But as I said, I don't think it would be wise to start supporting multiple distributions in a single CMake invocation for the runtime libraries. I think it would add too much complexity. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D89177/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D89177 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
