Anastasia added a comment. In D89372#2341638 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89372#2341638>, @mantognini wrote:
> I don't want to stop the wider discussion, that being said I think I've > addressed the comment regarding the content of this PR. Let me know if the > latest version is fine or needs further addressing. Thanks. Thank you for providing comprehensive information regarding the extensions being removed. Since there are no kernel language changes in those I still see no reason to keep them in clang! However, regarding the discussion about the general extension mechanisms for the language changes, @jvesely would you be willing to describe your vision regarding extensions pragma on this issue https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-Docs/issues/82? Or otherwise, would you be ok if I summarise it there? I think it would be useful to aggregate all the information before discussing future directions with Khronos. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D89372/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D89372 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
