EricWF added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16544#404283, @bcraig wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16544#403273, @EricWF wrote: > > > Just spitballing but have you considered simply passing the full path, > > including the library name, to LIT? Instead of needing `enable_shared` > > variables we would simply use the named library, be it DSO or archive. > > > I agree that this would be nice. I don't really like the nest of if / else > statements that I currently have in place. However, I have now attempted to > do this, and failed. My cmake-fu just isn't strong enough. OK. Thanks for looking into this. I figured CMake would stand in our way. Last I looked into it CMake doesn't actually know the name of the library it's going to produce until way to late in the configuration process. Lets go ahead with this. http://reviews.llvm.org/D16544 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
